By Saul Newman
This ebook explores the impression of poststructuralism on modern political idea through focussing on difficulties and matters relevant to politics at the present time. Drawing at the theoretical issues dropped at gentle by way of the ‘poststructuralist’ thinkers Foucault, Derrida, Lacan, Deleuze and Max Stirner, Newman presents a severe exam of latest advancements in modern political thought: post-Marxism, discourse research, new theories of ideology and tool, hegemony, radical democracy and psychoanalytic thought. He re-examines the political in gentle of those advancements in conception to indicate new methods of puzzling over politics via a mirrored image at the demanding situations that confront it. This quantity could be of serious curiosity to scholars of postmodernism and poststructuralist conception in political technology, philosophy, sociology, philosophy and cultural reports.
Read Online or Download Power and Politics in Poststructuralist Thought: New Theories of the Political (Routledge Innovations in Political Theory) PDF
Best history & theory books
Why may a political theorist enterprise into the nexus among neuroscience and movie? in line with William Connolly-whose new booklet is itself an eloquent answer-the blend exposes the ever present function that strategy performs in considering, ethics, and politics. by means of taking on fresh study in neuroscience to discover the best way mind task is inspired via cultural stipulations and stimuli reminiscent of movie approach, Connolly is ready to model a brand new standpoint on our makes an attempt to negotiate-and thrive-within a deeply pluralized society whose tradition and economic climate proceed to quicken.
During this interesting heritage of the maths division on the college of California, Berkeley, Moore describes how this establishment advanced from a unmarried facutly member at a financially-troubled deepest collage right into a significant examine heart that's ranked one of the best possible within the united states and on this planet.
This research represents the unforeseen consequence of an enquiry into the assets for the research of the medieval historical past of East principal Europe. whereas interpreting assets for a deliberate survey of medieval Poland, Bo hemia, Hungary, and Croatia, it grew to become obvious to me that many present shows of the background of Bohemia and Moravia weren't according to workable proof.
- Modern Pluralism: Anglo-American Debates Since 1880
- Created Equal: A Social and Political History of the United States, Brief Edition, Combined Volume
- Outside In: Minorities and the Transformation of American Education
- Organization theory : from Chester Barnard to the present and beyond
- Community Under Anarchy Transnational Identity and the Evolution of Cooperation
Additional resources for Power and Politics in Poststructuralist Thought: New Theories of the Political (Routledge Innovations in Political Theory)
In doing so, they would be abolishing one of the few remaining places of individual autonomy. Social equality and commonality are thus a more effective means of limiting individual autonomy. Therefore, society itself becomes the new locus of sovereignty and domination, rather than the liberal state. Once again the individual is alienated by an abstract generality, according to Stirner. Like the liberal state, the idea of society is seen as sacred and universal, demanding of the individual the same self-sacrifice and unquestioned obedience.
As Stirner shows, the figure of man central to humanism and liberalism is always haunted by an other – the ‘un-man’ or Unmensch. The un-man is that part of the individual that is leftover from the dialectical process, and which cannot be incorporated into the general identity of humanity: ‘Liberalism as a whole has a deadly enemy, an invincible opposite . . by the side of man stands the un-man, the individual, the egoist’ (Stirner 1995: 125). Therefore, there is a point at which the universalizing dialectic of liberalism fails to fully incorporate difference – and difference remains, even if only in the spectral form of the un-man, as a radical excess which escapes its logic.
Perhaps it could be argued, then, that Stirner’s most radical gesture is to actually take the message of liberalism – the valorization of individual autonomy and freedom – seriously, pushing it to its furthest limits and thereby revealing the gap between this message and the reality of liberal politics. Towards a politics of ‘post-liberalism’ Stirner’s critique, despite its eccentricity, clearly poses problems for liberal political theory. By unmasking the disciplinary underside of liberalism – the oppressive normalizing practices that go into constituting the neutral liberal subject – Stirner has exposed the paradoxical nature of liberal notions of freedom, individual rights and autonomy.